|
|
FAST FACTS
Population
6,349,097
2000 U.S. Census Bureau
Land area
7,838 sq. miles
2000 U.S. Census Bureau
Capital
Boston
Municipalities
351
Miles of Highway
34,725
2000 MOBD
Miles of RR
1,246
2000 MOBD
Miles of Coastline
1,980
2000 MOBD
Deepwater Ports
6
2000 MOBD
Airports
47
2000 MOBD
Labor Force
3,369,000 (2002)
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Median age
36.5 years
2000 U.S. Census
HS graduates
85.1%
2000 U.S. Census
BA/BS or higher
32.7%
2000 U.S. Census
Accredited Colleges & Universities
122
2002 MOBD
KEY INDUSTRIES
Advanced Materials
Biotechnology
Education & Research
Electronics
Environmental Technology
Fabricated Metals
Financial Services
Health Services and Medical Technology
Ind. Machinery & Equip.
Information Technology
Paper
Photonics
Plastics
Software
Telecommunications
Textiles & Apparel
Tourism
TOP 25 PUBLIC EMPLOYERS IN MA
  1. Charles River Laboratories International Inc.
  2. TJX Cos.
  3. Perini Corp.
  4. Investors Financial Services Corp.
  5. Gillette Co.
  6. Staples Inc.
  7. Onesource Information Services
  8. Reebok International Ltd.
  9. Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc.
10. State Street Corp.
11. DeWolfe Cos.
12. Independent Bank Corp.
13. Talbots Inc.
14. Kronos Inc.
15. Yankee Candle Inc.
16. Eaton Vance Corp.
17. Haemonetics Corp.
18. Lifeline Systems Inc.
19. Biogen Inc.
20. Cabot Corp.
21. Millipore Corp.
22. Dynamics Research Corp.
23. CCBT Financial Cos.
24. J. Jill Group
25. Designs Inc.
[Source: The Boston Globe, 2002]
|
|
>
|
|
Industry
Profile: Medical Devices
MAED
co-sponsored Massachusetts
Works for Life Sciences held on June 13, 2002.
Watch
for other profiles as we post them:
•Biotechnology
"If
I were to come in from Mars and want to
start a science-based, technology-based
company, I would look first for where
the pool of this kind of talent is the
deepest . . . Massachusetts is the
epicenter of that world."
--James
E. Tobin, President and CEO, Boston
Scientific Corporation. (The Boston
Globe, 5/16/2000).
Massachusetts
medical device highlights
-
The state is at the forefront of the
medical
device industry, gathering national
attention with advances such as the
first fully implantable replacement
heart developed by the Massachusetts
company ABIOMED.
-
The Massachusetts medical device industry's
share of employment in the state is
nearly three times larger than in the
nation as a whole.
-
The state is second
in the nation in medical device
industry activity, gauged by a
combination of per capita and
absolute measures of employment,
payroll, value added, and value of
shipments.
Cluster advantages
- Surgical
and medical instruments and
electromedical and
electrotherapeutic apparatuses are
particular strengths of the
Massachusetts industry.
- Strong
in-state supply network for medical
device inputs, including electronic
components and accessories, other
medical devices, and plastics.
- Local
suppliers allow more control over
inputs, especially at product
development and testing stages.
- Massachusetts
medical device manufacturers have a
convenient in-state market. For
every $1 million in services, local
hospitals buy $28,120 in medical
devices, and for every $1 million of
their services, local health practitioners
buy $25,050 from medical device
manufacturers.
Labor
force advantages
- Massachusetts
has one of the best-educated labor
forces in the nation, ranking first in the nation for college
attainment.[i]
- More
than half of medical device workers
need college educations.
- Science
and engineering are especially
strong fields for Massachusetts,
with the state regularly achieving
the highest concentration of science
and engineering graduate students.[ii]
- Productivity
in Massachusetts medical device
manufacturing exceeds the industry
average, reflecting the state’s
high skill level and research focus.
- Massachusetts
received 15.6% of Small Business
Innovation Research awards from 1990
to 1998, more than six times the
state’s share of population.[iii]
Strong
support for research
- National
Institutes of Health research
funding for Massachusetts totaled
$1.48 billion in fiscal year 2000,
second only to California.
- Massachusetts
leads the nation in per capita NIH
funding, outpacing the next highest
state, Maryland, by 52%.
- Much
of this funding is concentrated in
Boston and Cambridge, which together
drew 49% more NIH funding than New
York, the second-ranked city, in
fiscal year 2000.
- The
top five independent hospitals to
receive NIH support in fiscal year
2000 are all in Massachusetts.
[iv]
- More
than 10% of venture capital funding
for the medical devices industry is
regularly destined for
Massachusetts.[v]
Massachusetts
hospitals and universities provide a
rich source of research. Between 30
and 40 percent of their licenses and
joint ventures are with in-state
companies.
More
than half of the $200 million in
research money at the University of
Massachusetts goes to the UMass
Medical Center, while Massachusetts
General Hospital conducts $250 million
in research annually.
Top
health
care industry
- Large
healthcare industry accounts for
more than 10% of the state’s
employment base.[vi]
- Massachusetts
ranks first in the number of doctors
per 100,000 population.[vii]
- Two
of the top fifteen hospitals in the
United States are in Massachusetts.
Twelve Massachusetts hospitals are
nationally ranked in specialty
areas.[viii]
- Massachusetts
exports hospital services. Nearly
37,000 out-of-state residents
generated more than $662.1 million
in charges in 1998.[ix]
- Large
network of teaching and research
hospitals is a valuable resource for
testing new devices. Both
Massachusetts General Hospital and
Brigham and Women’s Hospital have
been approved as sites for trial
implantations of Abiomed’s
artificial heart.
Business
Presence and Leadership
More
than 260 medical device manufacturing
establishments in Massachusetts employ
more than 20,000 workers and ship $4
billion in products.
Largest
Medical Device Companies
[Companies
ranked by 1999 medical device sales]
[Source:
Boston Business Journal, 2001]
Organizational
Resources
Massachusetts
Medical Device Industry Council
(MassMEDIC)
MassMEDIC serves as a forum and an
advocate for the medical device industry
in Massachusetts, providing information
on industry trends and public policy.
Massachusetts Biotechnology Council (MBC)
Founded in 1985, the MBC is a private not for profit trade association
representing biotechnology companies in Massachusetts.
Massachusetts Biomedical Initiatives (MBI)
MBI is a catalyst for economic development and job creation for the
biotechnology and medical device industries in Central Massachusetts.
Recent
Developments
- Abiomed, Inc. of Danvers, MA is pleased to report that the second recipient of the first self-contained artificial heart for patients with heart failure and without recourse to a heart transplant, the AbioCor™ Implantable Replacement Heart, Mr. Tom Christerson, has today had his life supported for six months (181 days) with this new technology. Abiomed, Inc., 16 April 2002.
- Boston
Scientific Corp. of Natick, MA has enrolled 1,172 patients in its TAXUS IV paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS™ stent system for the treatment of coronary restenosis. TAXUS IV is a pivotal trial designed to collect data to support regulatory filings for U.S. product commercialization. Boston Scientific Corporation , 18 June 2002.
- Research
on the brain is booming in
Massachusetts. MIT is building a
$350 million brain research
institute in Cambridge;
Belmont-based McLean Hospital, the
state's largest psychiatric care
hospital, is planning a $10 million
brain research wing; and in
Worcester, the $12 million Brudnick
Neuropsychiatric Research Institute
of the UMass Medical Center, located
on the grounds of Worcester State
Hospital, has been completed. Boston
Business Journal, 9 March 2001.
The
primary source for this industrial
profile is:
Clayton-Matthews,
Alan. The Medical Device Industry in
Massachusetts: Executive Summary.
University of Massachusetts Donahue
Institute, 2001. Available at here.
Additional
sources of information are noted as they
appear.
[i] U.S. Census Bureau,
“Census 2000 Supplementary Survey.”
Available at: <http://factfinder.census.gov/home/en/c2ss.html>
[ii] National Science
Foundation, Division of Science
Resources Studies, Graduate
Students and Postdoctorates in
Science and Engineering: Fall 1999.
Available at: <http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/nsf01315/start.htm>
[iii] National Science
Foundation, Division of Science
Resources Studies, Science and
Engineering State Profiles:1998-99. Available
at: <http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/nsf01317/htmstart.htm>
[iv] National Institutes of
Health, Office of Extramural
Research. Award Data. Available at:
<http://grants.nih.gov/grants/award/rankings.htm>
[v] PricewaterhouseCoopers,
Moneytree Survey. Available at:
<http://www.pwcmoneytree.com>
[vi] Bureau of Labor
Statistics, State and Area Current
Employment Statistics, 2000.
Available at: <http://www.bls.gov/790home.htm>
[vii] U.S. Census Bureau. Statistical
Abstract of the United States,
2000. “Medical Doctors Per 100,000
Population.” Available at:
<http://www.census.gov/statab/www/ranks.html>
[viii] “Best Hospitals
2001,” U.S. News & World
Report. Available at: <http://www.usnews.com/usnews/nycu/health/hosptl/tophosp.htm>
[ix] Standard & Poor’s
DRI. “The Massachusetts
Health-Care Industry: A Stalled
Engine of Economic Growth,” April
2000. Available at: <http://www.savehealthcare.com/DRI-MHA%20final%20report1.htm>
|
|
| |
|
|